Brazilian Senate Advances National Policy on Critical Minerals Amid Global Interest

The Brazilian Senate's Commission on Economic Affairs is progressing discussions on a national critical minerals policy, aiming to secure supply chains crucial for energy transition amidst global strategic interest.

    Key details

  • • The Senate's Commission on Economic Affairs resumed analysis of bill PL 4443/2025 to create a National Policy on Critical and Strategic Minerals.
  • • The proposal includes creating a Brazilian List of Critical Minerals and mechanisms like financing lines and Mineral Transformation Processing Zones.
  • • Senator Esperidião Amin reopened the amendment period but seeks to fast-track the bill ahead of the Chamber of Deputies' process.
  • • The policy discussion gains significance due to global interest, notably from the U.S., reflecting Brazil's strategic role in energy transition supply chains.

The Brazilian Senate's Commission on Economic Affairs (CAE) has resumed discussions on a crucial bill establishing a National Policy on Critical and Strategic Minerals, aiming to position Brazil prominently in essential supply chains for energy transition technologies. This legislative activity, involving bill PL 4443/2025 authored by Senator Renan Calheiros (MDB-AL), follows a recent postponement as the rapporteur, Senator Esperidião Amin (PP-SC), sought additional input from mining and industry stakeholders.

The proposed legislation is designed to create a Brazilian List of Critical and Strategic Minerals, including key elements such as lithium, nickel, graphite, and rare earths, vital for manufacturing batteries for electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar panels, and semiconductors. It outlines guidelines to secure the supply of these materials and suggests various support mechanisms like financing lines and incentives for research and innovation. The bill also introduces the concept of Mineral Transformation Processing Zones (ZPTMs), special zones with simplified licensing to foster processing and industrialization within Brazil.

Following stakeholder demands, Amin reopened the period for amendment submissions, although both he and other senators have emphasized the need to accelerate the legislative process to ensure the Senate finalizes its version ahead of similar proceedings in the Chamber of Deputies. Senator Wilder Morais (PL-GO), who is preparing to report on the bill in the Infrastructure Services Commission (CI), advocates for a comprehensive yet swift approval process, inclusive of public hearings but excluding unnecessary delays.

This renewed legislative effort coincides with heightened international interest, particularly from the United States under President Donald Trump's administration, highlighting the strategic importance of Brazil's mineral resources in the global energy transition context. Senate discussions on the national policy reflect an urgent response to vulnerabilities in the mineral sector, recognizing its economic and technological significance.

The Senate's broader agenda alongside this policy debate includes other significant social and economic issues, such as the proposal for a medical proficiency exam and hearings on violence against journalists and sustainable fishing, underscoring the institution's active role in addressing diverse national priorities.

This article was translated and synthesized from Brazilian sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.

Source comparison

Bill identification

Sources refer to different bill numbers for the national policy on critical minerals.

oglobo.globo.com

"the bill, authored by Senator Renan Calheiros (MDB-AL), was postponed last week as the rapporteur, Esperidião Amin (PP-SC), requested more time to gather input from mining and industry representatives."

www12.senado.leg.br

"the Commission on Economic Affairs will begin debates on a national policy for critical and strategic minerals (PL 4443/2025)"

Why this matters: Source 183193 mentions the bill as PL 4443/2025, while Source 183194 refers to it as PL 2294/2024. This discrepancy could confuse readers about which specific legislation is being discussed.