Investigation Uncovers Suspected Billion-Dollar Fraud in Banco Master and BRB Dealings
Conflicting testimonies and a federal investigation reveal an alleged billion-dollar fraud scheme involving Banco Master and BRB, with BRB facing over R$5 billion in losses due to suspected non-existent credit portfolios.
- • Daniel Vorcaro and Paulo Henrique Costa gave conflicting testimonies about credit portfolios' origins in Banco Master-BRB dealings.
- • Central Bank director Ailton Aquino confirmed fraudulent credits at Banco Master and criticized BRB governance failures.
- • BRB must provision more than R$ 5 billion after acquiring non-existent assets, according to the investigation.
- • Vorcaro maintains all transactions were profitable, denying losses or political favoritism, while a billion-dollar fraud scheme is under Federal Police investigation.
Key details
Recent testimonies and investigations have brought to light a complex financial scandal involving Banco Master and the Banco de Brasília (BRB), centering on the sale of non-existent credit portfolios that have led to significant losses for the public bank.
Daniel Vorcaro, founder of Banco Master, and Paulo Henrique Costa, former president of BRB, provided conflicting accounts regarding the origins and validity of these credit portfolios. Vorcaro claimed that the operations only brought profits to BRB, emphasizing that prior to their partnership, BRB was underperforming, and they restored financial health through these dealings. He also denied any political interference or favoritism in the approval processes, stating all transactions went through standard evaluations, and insisted no losses occurred to BRB or its clients regarding the acquisition of assets from Tirreno, valued at R$ 6 billion.
However, testimony from Ailton Aquino, a director at the Central Bank, painted a contrasting picture. Aquino confirmed the existence of fraudulent credits issued by Banco Master and criticized BRB's governance for failing to identify these irregularities. According to him, BRB faces a necessity to provision over R$ 5 billion following the acquisition of these non-existent assets. Additionally, the investigation revealed administrative failures within BRB, including poor communication and oversight during negotiations, which raised suspicions about the credit’s origins.
This case, now under the scrutiny of the Supreme Court led by Minister Dias Toffoli, centers on an alleged billion-dollar fraud scheme involving Banco Master executives. Authorities, supported by the Federal Public Ministry, investigate the circulation of fictitious high-yield securities intended to artificially inflate financial results. Vorcaro maintains his innocence, attributing the broader financial consequences to systemic issues rather than his dealings.
As the legal process continues, the Supreme Court will decide whether the case remains at that level or is forwarded to lower courts. The unfolding investigation highlights significant governance challenges in Brazil’s banking sector and raises urgent questions about accountability and transparency in public bank transactions.
This article was translated and synthesized from Brazilian sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.
Source articles (2)
Source comparison
Credit portfolio value
Sources report different values for the credit portfolio involved in the negotiations.
oglobo.globo.com
"Aquino stated that BRB should provision over R$ 5 billion due to the acquisition of these assets."
poder360.com.br
"Vorcaro specifically mentioned that the negotiation involving the acquisition of the Tirreno portfolio, valued at R$ 6 billion, did not incur losses for BRB or its clients."
Why this matters: One source states the Tirreno portfolio was valued at R$ 6 billion, while the other mentions potential fraud involving over R$ 5 billion in non-existent credits. This discrepancy affects the understanding of the financial implications of the transactions.