Proposed Reforms on Brazil's Super Salaries Could Save Hundreds of Billions Over Two Decades
Studies reveal Brazil could save over R$ 500 billion by reforming super salaries of judges and public officials, amid public concern and stalled legislative reforms.
- • Brazil could save over R$ 500 billion in 20 years by tightening super salary regulations.
- • 86.3% of judges and public officials earn above the constitutional salary ceiling of R$ 46,366.19.
- • Congress recently approved allowing Congress members to legally exceed salary limits, raising fiscal concerns.
- • Reforms to eliminate extra payments and unify salary tables are stalled with low congressional support.
- • STF Minister Flávio Dino has suspended illegal additional salary payments and ordered reviews.
Key details
Brazil faces significant fiscal challenges linked to the payment of "supersalários"—salaries exceeding the constitutional ceiling—particularly in the Judiciary and legislative branches. Recent studies highlight the substantial economic impact and ongoing debates on reforming these payments. A study by República.org, cited by both Estadao and CNN Brasil, reveals that Brazil could save over R$ 500 billion in 20 years by tightening rules around super salaries, mainly targeting judges, prosecutors, and public defenders. In 2025, 86.3% of 25,900 public officials analyzed received salaries above the constitutional ceiling of R$ 46,366.19—the monthly salary of a Supreme Court minister—resulting in R$ 12.6 billion paid beyond this limit. The average annual salary for judges stands at R$ 1.1 million, far exceeding counterparts in other nations.
The Brazilian National Congress recently approved a project allowing members of Congress to legally receive salaries above the constitutional ceiling, causing public concern about the growing fiscal burden. A related study suggests that revising distribution rules could yield R$ 186.4 billion in savings over 10 years, with retroactive payments such as vacation and leave indemnities heavily impacting government budgets. From 2023 to 2024, over R$ 2.9 billion in retroactive payments were made to more than half of active prosecutors and attorneys, especially in Rio de Janeiro, Paraná, São Paulo, Minas Gerais, and Maranhão. This places Brazil among the highest spenders on supersalários, surpassing multiple countries in Europe and the Americas, with expenses reaching R$ 20 billion between August 2024 and July 2025—over twenty times higher than Argentina, the second-largest spender.
In response, Supreme Federal Court (STF) Minister Flávio Dino has suspended payments of illegal additional salaries and mandated a review of these benefits by public agencies. Concurrently, an administrative reform aiming to eliminate additional payments called "penduricalhos" and establish a single salary table for public servants faces stalled progress in Congress, with only 15.2% of deputies supporting the measure. Furthermore, public distrust in the STF has risen to 60%, the highest since early 2023, fueled by controversies surrounding these salary practices.
These developments underline a critical moment in Brazil’s fiscal policy, as the government and judiciary grapple with balancing fair remuneration for public servants against the broader need for fiscal responsibility and public confidence. The coming months will be crucial for the fate of these proposed reforms and their potential to reshape Brazil's public pay structure.
This article was translated and synthesized from Brazilian sources, providing English-speaking readers with local perspectives.
Source articles (2)
Source comparison
Projected savings from reforms
Sources report different potential savings from reforms on supersalaries.
estadao.com.br
"Brazil could save over R$ 500 billion over the next 20 years by implementing stricter regulations on 'supersalaries'."
cnnbrasil.com.br
"Brazil could save R$ 578 billion over 20 years with stricter limitations."
Why this matters: One source claims Brazil could save over R$ 500 billion over 20 years, while the other estimates savings of R$ 578 billion over the same period. This significant difference in projected savings affects understanding of the financial implications of proposed reforms.