Controversial Refereeing Mars Palmeiras' Narrow Win Over Vasco in Copa do Brasil Semifinal
Palmeiras edged Vasco 1-0 in the Copa do Brasil semifinal first leg amid contentious refereeing decisions, including a missed handball call and VAR inaction, sparking strong protests from Vasco.
Key details
- Palmeiras won 1-0 in the Copa do Brasil semifinal first leg with a goal by Maurício.
- Referee Emerson Daronco did not award a penalty for Barboza’s handball, confirmed by VAR's lack of intervention.
- Vasco’s director Admar Lopes harshly criticized the referee’s decisions as 'shameful'.
- Alan Saldivia of Vasco was sent off after a second yellow card, escalating match tensions.
In the first leg of the 2026 Copa do Brasil semifinal at Nubank Parque, Palmeiras secured a 1-0 advantage against Vasco, courtesy of a 23rd-minute goal by Maurício. The goal stemmed from a well-coordinated play, with an assist from Arias leading to a left-footed finish past Vasco’s goalkeeper Léo Jardim. This victory positions Palmeiras favorably, needing only a draw in the second leg at São Januário to advance to the final.
However, the match was overshadowed by contentious refereeing decisions, which sparked heated reactions. Referee Emerson Daronco faced harsh criticism from Vasco's side for failing to award a penalty on a clear handball by Palmeiras defender Barboza, a call that was also not reviewed or overturned by VAR. Vasco’s players and staff vocally protested this oversight, emphasizing that the incident significantly influenced the match dynamics.
Adding to the controversy was the expulsion of Vasco's Alan Saldivia, who received a second yellow card, a critical moment that left Vasco playing with ten men. Vasco’s director, Admar Lopes, described Daronco’s performance as “shameful,” also pointing out inconsistencies such as the absence of a yellow card for Palmeiras' Murilo after a foul on Vascaíno Colidio. Lopes criticized the VAR team for failing to intervene on key decisions, implying that these errors could be pivotal in the ultimate outcome of the semifinal tie.
Interestingly, Lucas Evangelista of Palmeiras chimed in on social media, humorously admitting he initially thought the ball struck an opponent's hand during the handball incident, showing mixed reactions even among Palmeiras players.
With Palmeiras dominating their recent rivalry against Vasco—winning 12 of their last 17 encounters and maintaining a 14-match unbeaten run in the Brasileirão—the second leg at São Januário presents a significant challenge for Vasco, who must win to keep their title hopes alive. Both teams will participate in midweek Brasileirão fixtures ahead of the decisive match.
The refereeing controversies remain a talking point, potentially impacting the semifinal’s future and stirring debate about officiating standards and VAR's role in high-stakes Brazilian football matches.
Source articles (2)
Source comparison
Penalty claim
Sources report different handball incidents leading to penalty claims.
jb.com.br
"referee Emerson Daronco failed to call a penalty for a handball by Vasco's Barbosa"
estadao.com.br
"Vasco players claimed a penalty for a handball by Palmeiras defender Barboza."
Why this matters: One source claims Vasco players protested a handball by Palmeiras' Barboza, while the other states it was a handball by Vasco's Barbosa. This discrepancy affects the understanding of the controversy surrounding the officiating.